home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.lang.asm.x86,comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Path: kbbs.org!hp
- From: hp@kbbs.org (Holger Petersen)
- Subject: Re: FREEDOS: did someone see it? (was Re: ANNOUNCE: New Free-DOS
- Message-ID: <1996Feb8.155359.10019@kbbs.org>
- Organization: We don't need no organisation
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 15:53:59 GMT
- References: <3jkaun$8rn@2hoog.vpro.nl> <3k8iue$1ncb@rs6a.wln.com> <4enb2g$711@spruce.citicorp.com> <621WV-sfN1B@oscar.north.de> <4evol1$lla@dfw.nkn.net> <4f8a2s$sgq@natasha.rmii.com>
-
- jcoffin@rmii.com (Jerry Coffin) writes:
-
-
- >The reality of the situation is almost entirely the opposite of your
- >statement: as of DOS 2.0, virtually all of MS-DOS had been completely
- >rewritten from the ground up
-
- With (at least) one exception:
-
- SORT is still limited to 64K of data.
-
- Yes, it was changed from version to version: It always contained a
- version-number check...
-
- Greetings, Holger
-
- PS: Has anybody knowledge of the INTERLINK - algorithmes?
- I loved to have a LINUX-compatible version...
-